![]() |
|||||
| | | | | | | | |||||
Research: Deliverables: D3.4 Information Gateways Handbook: Peer review 2
This is the handbook, what we need in the world of information gateways. It put together all subjects in this area. It is useful every people, who are working with gateways. I read this prototype version of handbook very interested, because I´m working here in Finland in same kind of book project. We collect our experiencences in Finnish Virtual Library Project (http://www.jyu.fi/library/virtuaalikirjasto/) to handbook. Aim of our book project is to get more organisations involved in our Virtual Library Work. I didn´t find any bad mistakes in the content of handbook. The European gurus in this area surely know, what they are saying. Also the language and structure of book is clear. Link system works well and language is very understandable for non-english persons. I hope that this kind of book will be freely available in the net and it will be updated frequently. Some little corrections and comments, anyway: 1.1. Information gateways overview Example of The Finnish Virtual Library Project Text should be (more informative): The Finnish Virtual Library project, launched in 1996 and funded directly by the Finnish Ministry of Education, aims to form a foundation for a Finnish field-specific subject index of subject gateways. A collection of libraries have produced individual virtual libraries over 50 subject areas; these are now being converted into a gateway format, and offered as bilingual services in Finnish and English. For instance Kuopio University Library has mounted its Virtual Library as a ROADS-based gataway, covering the subject areas of Clinical Nutrition, Environmental Health, Molecular Medicine and Gene Therapy and Pharmacy. The Finnish Virtual Library has also co-operation with Nordic NOVAGate Information gateway. 2.3. Resourse Discovery Issues of mature gateways Text: - collection management - you need to ensure that all the different subject areas within your collection are growing at the same rate - target efforts at areas that are falling behind and require development. Comment: I think that we must agree that in internet there is little material for some subject areas. So it is useless to keep amount of records equal for every subject-field in gateway. Glossary Text: URL-minder a service based in California, USA, twhich enables you to track changes made to Web sites Comment: There is also URL-minder services outside California ;-) 2.4. Metadata formats General comment: The chapter is full of jargon and acronyms, but where is the glossary? Why create metadata formats? Text: Information gateways are services that give access to networked resources in particular subject areas, linguistic domains, and so on. Many Internet portals simply comprise of sets of Web pages with lists of hyperlinks on a static Web page, perhaps with annotations, however, this approach has distinct disadvantages:
Comment: Anyway, if there is clearly under 100 records in gateway, it is rather easy to maintain collection in link list format. We must think about different strategies of subject gateways. Some maintainers of gateways like the idea to keep the amount of recources under 100 in their collection. Their strategy is to store only the best resources in the subject area and nothing else. They don’t need any database solutions, so they don’t need to give resources for configuration of database. They can just concentrate only to main thing: to select resources from the net, describe them and maintain "their little resource garden". I think, that this kind of strategy is suitable for some subject gateways: anyway there is no words about this strategy in Information Gateway Handbook. 2.14. Co-operation between gateways Glossary General comment: In the Example part "RDNet The Resource Discovery Network" is term "hub". I think, that it needs explanation in the glossary. |
|
Contact | © 1998-2000 DESIRE Consortium | Disclaimer | Search Last updated: 30 September 99 |